6 Comments
User's avatar
SIRIUS's avatar

Agreed. The control system is too big and powerful and it can not be defeated without complete boycott and disobedience. And at the same time making a parallel system which could replace it. So I tend to think that the urban collective is beyond saving. Well organized Individuals and small communities who live without fear and are smart enough to protect them selves from central banking and governments are the only solution and way forward. At least thats how I see it.

Cheers MR.E

Expand full comment
SIRIUS's avatar

Also, Anarchism is the only way to go. Kropotkin had some good ideas about what Anarchism should look like. But if one is exiting a capitalist system, I think Anarcho-capitalism should be the first step.

Expand full comment
Esther Cook's avatar

What do YOU mean by "capitalism," Sirius? For example, the USA is often called "capitalist," when in fact it has all 10 planks of The Communist Manifesto," that means USA is a Communist country.

Expand full comment
SIRIUS's avatar

Yes I know, secretly its a communist system. But openly it calls itself capitalist. So I used that term. And I have written about it on more than one occasion. But here, feel free to like subscribe and share :

https://siriusispodstruje.substack.com/p/wall-street-communists

cheers

Expand full comment
Gary Marshall's avatar

There are always simple answers to the problems that plague us, if only one would spend a few minutes would to look for them.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/case-government-borrower-limit-tyranny

Expand full comment
JohnSmith's avatar

"Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded, not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering a high morale and community purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history..." -- David Rockefeller, CFR chairman, NY Times, 1973-08-10

Expand full comment