I'll say. A remarkable article. I figured out myself that all conspiracy theory books were fakes but I was just operating on intuition and life experience. I never realized that it was already a verifiable known fact to the properly educated. This will likely open a new avenue of reading in my personal education.
Ok so why the hex (6) point star of David for Israel's flag. Also Israel was non existent until 1940s so that means it most definitely had to be a people's land that got stolen. Also the all seeing eye pyramid on the American dollar? And also all seeing eye and pyramid on the roof of Israel's Supreme Court? This is a great compilation of people's interpretatipns of the exact same narrative probably. There are still some unanswered questions & way too many other coincidences & narratives. Also why are Americans taught that every country is bad & we must intrude on people's and policies all while dangling a fraudulent piece of paper in their face and massacre innocent humans? It's clear w the theater that is congress and the illusion of a 2 party system someone or some entity has most definitely got an agenda!
Come on Mr. E. The protocols is not a proven hoax at all.
I'm not saying it's definitely not a hoax because who the hell knows?
The document was "discovered" by a theosophist, and "debunked" by Allen Dulles who went on to head the CIA.
If you trust Allen Dulles' debunking or indeed anything else Allen Dulles ever did or said then you are - I'm afraid - a sucker. I doubt the man ever spoke a true word in his life.
The debunking claims that the document was copied from a satirical piece by Maurice Joly - but that doesn't really stand up to scrutiny for various reasons.
I'm not arguing that the protocols weren't a hoax. Perhaps they were. They were certainly surrounded by murky inteeligence operatives from start to finish, but the "debunking" was a nonsense and certainly did not prove its case.
It was debunked only years after appearing by a journalist who demonstrated conclusively that huge portions of The Protocols were plagiarized from an earlier book called The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, written by Maurice Joly - and his work indeed does stand up to scrutiny.
1. Graves published his article in the Times in 1921 in three parts between August 16-18. The New York Times featured a series of articles denouncing the Protocols, the first of which appeared on Dec 1st 1920. The Times picked up Graves' story and re-published - merely as part of its series of articles attacking the protocols on Sep 4th 1921.
2. The journalist, Robert Graves, claims to have "discovered" the plagiarism while in Constantinople - the plagiarism was revealed to him by a "white russian" who handed him a copy of Maurice Joly's text and confessed to the hoax/plagiarism. Amusingly - in the context of your articles and our discussion - Joly was a Freemason. This white Russian was never named, nor seen, nor spoken to by anyone else. The story rests entirely on Grave's word. Coincidentally Allen Dulles was in Constantinope too, and returned to the US with the same story at the same time. This story is incredible on its face - a witness without a name who showed up out of the blue in Constaninople suddenly desperate to tell a story discrediting his own side who then immediately disappeared (in fact never even appeared in the first place to anyone except Graves) never to be seen or heard from again?
3. Denouncing the protocols was a political necessity at the time - the Zionists were mounting a strong campaign at the League of Nations to get Britain to turn Palestine into a Jewish homeland following the Balfour declaration. Hence the New York Times series of articles commenced well prior to the Dulles/Graves story. Lord Northcliffe, who was attempting to scupper the campaign and proposed to publish the Protocols in the London Times (he was the owner of the newspaper) was hauled off a train and committed to an insane asylum in Switzerland and then later arrested at the prompting of his own editor when he attempted to enter his own building in order to prevent the publication of this story. The point here is that high politics and skulduggery was involved in ths matter and therefore convenient and magical proofs deserve intense scrutiny - scrutiny which was not provided at the time and has not been permitted an airing since.
4. At the time the stories were published Joly's book was not available as Napoloen III had had all copies confiscated as he had (probably correctly) interpreted the work as a criticism of his rule. That is no longer the case, and you can easily compare both works. Graves gave twelve examples (mere sentences or short phrases) of similarities between the works and claimed there were many more. No-one was able to fact check him, because no copies of Joly's work were available.
However they are available today and it appears at least to me that, while the works are of a similar genre, and contain a handful of similar passages, that's about all that can be said. Reading both texts in toto does not leave one with the impression that either work was derived from the other. At most a few sentences were parapharsed here or there - but even that is not certain.
5. Then there is the matter of dates. The Protocols of Zion contains no reference to Zionism. This suggests that, whether real or hoax, they were written considerably prior to their discovery. The zionist movement was formally constitued by Theodor Herzl in 1897, but the idea and policies had been ongoing for a considerable time before this with the founding of Jewish settlements as early as 1870. Since no mention of zionism is found in the protocols it appears they were written well before that date at least and the protocols document decsribes the plot as centuries old, so - if real - it was not the first version of the plan. So the question then becomes - who plagiarized who? Did Joly perhaps steal from the protocols rather than the other way around? As a Jewish freemason, perhaps he had seen the protocols himself - he was after all a member of the "Lodge of Mizraim" where the Protocols document originated. He was the protege of Adolph Cremieux (Isaac Moise Cremieux 1796-1880) the head of the lodge, founder of the Alliance Israalite Universelle and a Minister in the Jewish-backed government of Leon Gambetta.
6. So we are left wondering whether plagiarism occurred at all, and if it did who plagiarized who? Joly, it turns, out, was an inveterate plagiarizer. He plagiarized the popular novel by Eugene Sue "Les Mystares du Paris." (1845), and the very work in question appears to have extensively plagiarized from another of Cremieux's proteges, Jacob Venedy, entitled, "Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Rousseau." (1850).
7. And finally there is the matter of logic. You claim that
(a) there is a powerful group who are implementing the new world order
(b) this group are extremely powerful and effectively control the world and epsecialy the media
(c) this group is not Jewish or Freemasons, and indeed are seeking to discredit both Jews and Freemasons through vile propaganda
(d) the media, controlled by the vile group who seek to discredit and scapegoat Jews and Freemasons, will not publish this propaganda and indeed have engaged in a century long campaign to discredit it.
Huh? Run that one by me again...
Now I'm not going to claim that the protocols are definitely NOT a hoax. Anything that emerges mysteriously from the swirl of power politics, bearing the fingerprints of masons, theosophists, and Allen Dulles might very well be a hoax.
But the supposed "debunking" is most certainly a hoax. The fact checkers back then were no different to the fact checkers of today - the sordid combination of yellow journalists operating at the direction of deep state handlers.
Les banquiers juifs inondent l’Europe de musulmans et l’Amérique de déchets du tiers-monde . . . L'exil comme une punition pour les gens qui prêchent la sédition devrait être rétabli au cadre juridique de l'Occident. Le judaïsme, le christianisme et l’islam sont des cultes de mort originaires du Moyen-Orient et totalement étrangers à l’Europe et à ses peuples.
Franchement, je m'en fiche si le Pape ou tout autre fou sectaire chrétien dit que nous devons «pâte à tartiner l'autre joue» . . . Police religieuse française comme l'Arabie Saoudite? Sans blague . . . La religieuse police vous arrêter pour avoir critiqué les juifs et les musulmans . . . Le juive occupé gouvernement français a mis Jean-Marie Le Pen en prison pour avoir critiqué l'islam!
La liberté d'expression en France? Taureau-merde!
Si les voilés portant le hijab ont effectivement incendié Notre-Dame, ils nous ont rendu un grand service, plus de trois mille pédérastes ont travaillé dans l'Église catholique française depuis 1950 . . . Le Vatican a une politique de «pâte à tartiner l'autre joue» pour garçons de autel . . . Le contrôle des naissances islamique est une bombe attachée à un enfant de dix ans . . . Le terme «musulmans modérés» signifie simplement qu’ils n’ont plus de munitions . . .
I believe the King James bible is accurate. The only good explanation for current events I've found is explained on the Rumble channel E511Ministries. Look for the video with Conspiracy Theory in the title. He explains that he thinks the conspiracy is run by Satan and his minions and no human has ever been let in on the conspiracy.
I notice that people drive themselves half crazy trying to come up with a secular/materialist explanation for things. It can't be done and the logical backflips required make drive them half mental.
Are you the same anti-catholic Mr. E who promotes the "Elite Gender Inversion" conspiracy theory with a library of entertaining videos on Bitchute and Odysee (Formerly youtube)?
Or are you just another anti-catholic with the same low-credibility pseudonym?
[26] The fairies are not to be seized on, and brought to answer for the hurt they do. So also the ecclesiastics vanish away from the tribunals of civil justice.
[27] The ecclesiastics take from young men the use of reason, by certain charms compounded of metaphysics, and miracles, and traditions, and abused Scripture, whereby they are good for nothing else but to execute what they command them. The fairies likewise are said to take young children out of their cradles, and to change them into natural fools, which common people do therefore call elves, and are apt to mischief.
[28] In what shop or operatory the fairies make their enchantment, the old wives have not determined. But the operatories of the clergy are well enough known to be the universities, that received their discipline from authority pontifical.
[29] When the fairies are displeased with anybody, they are said to send their elves to pinch them. The ecclesiastics, when they are displeased with any civil state, make also their elves, that is, superstitious, enchanted subjects, to pinch their princes, by preaching sedition; or one prince, enchanted with promises, to pinch another.
[30] The fairies marry not; but there be amongst them incubi that have copulation with flesh and blood. The priests also marry not.
.
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan: with selected variants from the Latin edition of 1668. Ed. Edwin Curley. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994 . . . Part IV. Of the Kingdom of Darkness . . . Chap. xlvii. Of the Benefit that proceedeth from such Darkness, and to Whom it Accrueth . . . https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/leviathan-part-iv-of-the-kingdom
(Edit: I overlooked the article's last paragraph, where you indicate that something "is afoot." I wrote my response with the impression you believed Taxil's hoax was limited to misunderstanding and misapplication. It seems you believe there is more to it, and I agree. Nevertheless, I stand by my statements, except for the implication you suggest Taxil's influence be dismissed.)
This is interesting. However, is dismissing Taxil's wild hoax the correct response? The uniformity of contemporaneous news outlets reporting on the big reveal (as described in the article) is reminiscent of Operation Mockingbird montages from today. Moreover, even if Taxil's narratives are fabricated, I am not convinced his stories had no purpose beyond pranking the Roman Catholic church.
Jamming a communication channel with bad information is a good way to reduce message comprehension. Additionally, if long-held beliefs concerning Freemasons and Luciferians are demonstrably false, logic does not require we throw the baby out with the bathwater. Instead, careful determination of the obfuscated truth is warranted.
There is depth to cunning; it appeals to one’s intellect, emotions, and desires. Furthermore, deception’s hallmark is approximating truth, as an unconvincing counterfeit is less useful. Various manipulations will compel a group to ignore atrocities (a la Epstein Island and Lahaina) and focus their attention on things convenient for the deceiver. Some may dive headlong into a falsehood. Others will see through it yet accept an authority's probable refutation and analysis. Biblically, the archdemon—called the devil in English—is the father of lies. Perhaps Taxil, whether knowingly or not, served a greater purpose.
True discernment is a gift and praxis. Today, truth is widely considered intersubjective and relative to the ad hoc whims of culture. What constitutes moral behavior, virtue, or valid authority when our reality is no longer objective and no universal truth exists? Democracy will not decide these things.
While perhaps not unequivocally certain, it is evident a certain caste manipulates international mechanisms with varying degrees of coordination. Regimes, NGOs, corporations, and the like ply techniques to sway and scare the plebians, executing an agenda that is, whether in full or in part, shared. Conspiracy theorists' bullhorned tropes of secret societies may paint a fuzzy picture, but the resonation has a source.
The scientific method and technological discovery caused Western civilization (in a general sense) to prosper, grow fat, and ultimately become sick with entitlement and arrogance. Global elites barely hide their intentions to control everyone. They engineer wars, disease, and compulsory treatment. Meanwhile, they salivate over god-like ascension via AI-powered cybernetics.
Many inherit a worldview that life is a simulation within a deterministic universe. Put another way, humans are accidents of nature, act with perceived will, and are motivated by preference. In such a paradigm, claims about meaning or purpose—or any claim at all—are fundamentally empty and have utility only to the extent that belief in each claim facilitates preferred outcomes in subjective experience. Such nonsensical drivel cannot inform the engineering of advanced machines and computing platforms. To account for this, the culture attempts to bifurcate reality into physical and social components.
Taxil was disillusioned with the Roman Catholics, whose leadership was and is a scourge. He bent his mind to parodying that institution and its scripture. Nonetheless, the roiling of religion, secular powers, and world conquest were stoked by his hoax, even if as a drop in the ocean. His input was consumed by the spirit animating technocracy, eugenics, transhumanism, transgenderism, climate alarmism, Bilderberg, EcoHealth, the UN, the WEF… the sum of players is certainly vast. No central headquarters exists in New York. Neither the Club of Rome nor the Palladium Rite is the tail that shakes the dog. The threat manifests itself as a complex system. A salient consideration is whether God is dead or if a metaphysical ultimate reality interacts in man’s bubble of subjective experience.
"Perhaps Taxil, whether knowingly or not, served a greater purpose."
Yes, he did. There is indeed a child-murdering cult out there (see my series "The Apocalypse of Yajnavalkya"), bent on world domination. But it's not the Freemasons, not even remotely close.
Anthony Sutton and Carrol Quigley wrote extensively about them. The actual organization is nameless, and they operate through many, many different proxies.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol No. 7 – World-Wide Wars
❝We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.❞
Those who blame the "Jews" are making a common mistake. The banking cartel is very real but they are Frankists not Jews. They alternate between hiding behind Jews and throwing them under the bus.
The heart and soul of the whole "Jewish World Conspiracy" is the Rothchild family. They are Frankists. They are about as Jewish as the Mafia are Catholic.
The Shabat Levi/Jacob Frank view is that their messiah will return when mankind hits rock bottom. So let's help it on it's way. Every filth and perversion is not only allowed but it is encouraged. Jacob Frank would tie up animals in his garden and do vile things to them IN FRONT OF GUESTS. Dude had issues to put it mildly. The diaries from some of the guests describe these events.
I hardly think that is representative of Judaism.
More importantly than just the Rothchilds themselves is who they used to fill out their crime cartel. Almost all crime cartels start out as ethnic groups. Initially it would have been other Frankists. Later they would expand out to other filth because there are lots of non-Frankist filth in this world willing to exploit and murder other humans for money and power.
The banking cartel is very real and if anyone doubts that please go read "Tragedy & Hope" by Carroll Quigley. It was published in the early 60's and I read it 40 years later. Today we are almost 60 years post publication and it still stands as the best explanation of our world.
So stop calling it "Jewish" and call it what it really is. Frankist & Affiliated Filth Banking Cartel.
Sadly regular Jews think that their elites will protect them. The F&AFBC have thrown them under the bus and hidden behind them repeatedly. Every cry of "anti-semitism" is done by someone duped into thinking they are superior by luck of birth. They are brainwashed and considered "useful idiots" by the F&AFBC.
The whole master race philosophy is based on the belief that by luck of birth into a group you are better than others and your life is worth more. It is not just the Germans, Japanese and Jews that have been duped by it. Lots of others have tried it but it has a 100% failure rate.
I call it the "master race philosophy" and it is very common. By luck of group membership, usually conferred by birth but not always, you are better than others and your life is worth more. There are dozens of examples throughout history and it has a 100% failure rate. The master race always ends up getting decimated. No exceptions.
Jews are the same as other humans. No better, no worse. The proof of that is that they fall for the same master race nonsense and the same excuses offered up by their religious and political leaders.
1) We really are the master race. All those others clearly were not but trust us, we really are.
2) This time it's different or our situation is different.
3) God is on our side or god has chosen us.
4) We are more intelligent/smarter.
All those have been trotted out by various religious and political leaders over the millennia again and again. They all end up getting decimated. Unless the Jewish community starts calling out their religious and political leaders when they utter this nonsense they will be decimated. There are a few that do but they are too few and far between to have a big impact.
The appeal of the master race philosophy is that you don't have to be world class in art, music, academics, sports or anything. Just being part of this group makes you better than others and your life worth more. Very appealing and seductive and very wrong. Fatally wrong.
Sadly it claims a lot of very bright humans. The hubris kicks in and they actually start believing their own lies. Albert Einstein said Germany was a "nation of philosophers" and he was right. Very well educated and bright with a strong philosophical bent. If a nation of philosophers can fall for the master race nonsense then who is kidding who that it "can't happen here"?
It is happening in Israel. Seize living room to the east, forced confinement in a ghetto (Gaza) for millions, economic exploitation and a caste system with the master race on top. To not see the parallels between modern Israel and 1930s Germany requires blinders of epic proportions.
Now it is going world wide. The F&AFBC is setting up "Concentration Camp Earth".
If you need more proof that there is no "Master Race" after the last 3 years then I can't help you. Look at the Jewish response to covid. 90% of the adults over 20 took the first 2 shots, 80% took the third and 50% took the fourth. Not very "masterful" now are they? What race, religion or nationality had the majority say "No" and stand their ground? None. The best of the hold outs were Switzerland and the USA with about 33%. Interestingly they are the 2 heaviest armed civilian populations.
Sry, I'm not buying this DOUBLE hoax from Taxil. Why? Jesuits are known converts. Their soul mission was to DESTROY/subvert the Catholic church from within. And they had a LOT of success. Why? Well, because the jews have been exiled by Christians from many places - due to their horrible satanic practices! So they converted to Christianity to protect themselves. First they were forced by Popes and later they did it on purpose and en mass! Read “The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews” by Robert Aleksander Maryks.
Freemasonry, which in the beggining was about masons who built all the magnificent buildings from Tartaria period, was completely hijacked by jews in 18th century in London. And became speculative Freemasonry. From that moment it is used to subvert all the monarchies and governments/politicians in the world which were not into usury and satanism. Weimar period of Germany is what ALL these parasites are about! And now USA is the new Weimar. It is SO obvious.
Heard of New Chronology and Fomenko's work? Jesuits, with J.Scalinger at the helm, also added 1000 years to the official chronology!
The link between Lucifer and Freemasonry does not depend solely on Leo Taxil's work. There is a mountain of other evidence based on the statements and correspondence of dozens of individuals.
Albert Pike himself wrote (in Morals and Dogma - a paean to pagan and kabbalistic thought and ritual) "The Apocalypse is, to those who receive the nineteenth Degree, the Apotheosis of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer. LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not! for traditions are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed. Plato and Philo, also, were inspired."
That seems pretty clear to me. Paraphrasing: once you are so amazing that you make it to the nineteenth degree you can set aside your simple faith in God and take your inspiration from Lucifer whose light is so bright that it is dangerous for lesser folks but OK for us morally superior beings.
I use that example because you seem to make the leap from the premise that Taxil invented Pike's letter to the conclusion that therefore Freemasonry is not Luciferian - but that is bad logic.
I think it is entirely possible, perhaps even likely, that Leo was himself a mason and that his entire exercise in performative art was a propaganda device which was intended to throw people off the scent.
I address every single reference Pike makes to "Lucifer" in this book, including this very quote, in a later post. You should read those as well.
The quote you reference makes clear that after the 19th degree the "Apocalypse", or realization, of the "Sublime Faith, which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer." is pretty obviously NOT someone saying they worship Lucifer.
In fact, it is the complete opposite.
This is consistent with what Pike says about Lucifer in other parts of Morals & Dogma.
"The Apocalypse is, to those who receive the nineteenth Degree, the Apotheosis of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer. LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not! for traditions are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed. Plato and Philo, also, were inspired."
I agree it could be interpreted in the way you suggest. But it's scarcely clear. For the second part of the quote gives a very mixed message: "traditions are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed. Plato and Philo, also, were inspired." That is most definitely not Christian, since wherever Plato and Philo drew there inspiration from, it was not Christ or the Christian God. So where did they draw there inspiration from? And why is that juxtaposed in the same paragraph with the Lucifer reference?
And the rest of the book provides a great deal more context. It's a paean to the Kabbalah (and other more ancient philosophies and mystical traditions, but the Kabbalah above all) - the Jewish mystical tradition which did not come from God at all, but was added to the Jewish faith by rabbis without instruction from God - and entirely perverts the meaning of God's word.
The idea that Pike is a Christian is absurd on its face. He led a secret society which is unChristian in and of itself and his book is inspired by just about everything ancient philosophy, spiritual tradition and false God from ancient Egypt onwards. The bible is crystal clear about this.
And if he is not a Christian, then what is his purpose? To subvert the word of God - to tempt people away from God's word with his teaching? Who does that remind you of?
I've read your deconstruction of Taxil. But the Luciferian nature of freemasonry does not depend on Taxil alone, or even mostly. That is a canard - and one I suspect that was deliberately set up by Taxil.
The evidence for the antiChristian/Luciferian/pagan nature of freemasonry (and its antecedent organizations) is vast and overwhelming. Taxil is merely a detail - an obvious attempt to throw casual investigators off the scent.
There is plenty of evidence which predates Taxil, and plenty which is entirely independent of him.
For example the links from Frankism to the Illuminati, the Illuminati takeover over of freemasonry as acknowledged by masons at the time (and well after the supposed end of the Illuminati when the elector of Bavaria banned them). And of course's Marx's association with the Illuminati (the communist manifesto is just plagiarism of Weishaupt's work) and his open admissions within his poetry that he marches to Satan's drum is literally damning.
Or the countless links through the Theosophical society to masonry, and various magical/Satanic societies (e.g. Golden Dawn, OTO, A.A. etc.) and political movements. And Helena Blavatsky's references to Lucifer are less ambiguous than Pike's.
The Gnostic (Lucifer/Satanism) influence over the Templars is widely accepted and there is considerable evidence for the Freemasons being simply a more recent incarnation of the Templars via the Rosicrucians.
The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita is a Freemasonic plot to infiltrate and overthrow the Catholic church.
There are a hundred more pieces of evidence, including direct quotes from Masons, intelligence agents and contemporary commenters.
Taxil was what we today, in a 5th gen warfare manual, would term a chaos agent. His job was to mislead, confuse and muddy the waters. Job well done apparently.
Hello, im a french catholic and I Wonder if you know the existence of the Vaughan memories and her book "the 33rd CRISPI".
If you wants to connect the dots, I highly recommend you to read the book of Mr Pierrecourt Paul Étienne "From Diana Vaughan to the secret of La Salette" 2019
Our Lady at Fatima and La Salette warned us of what s to come and it s happening right before our eyes.
PS ; catholics aren t cannibals because the sacrifice of the mass is non bloody, we eat god (spirit soul and corpse). Satan worshipers who stole the holy sacrement for their dark mass knows it...
Youtube link to mr Pierrecourt video on histoire book ;
Janet Ossebaard, of the video series "Fall of the Cabal" and "Sequel to the Fall of the Cabal" said she found a 14th century manuscript very similar to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I believe there really is a group with those horrible goals and pretending to be Jews. The Book of Revelations may have been 3rd century, not first, but whatever you believe about who wrote it or its religious veracity, that is a document at least 17 centuries old. It says at least twice "there are those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan." And who are the ELDERS of Zion? Not likely Jews. These are Khazarians or Canaanites. The Bible repeatedly mentions child sacrifice in Canaan/ancient Israel, and remains of it have been found in many places.
Everyone knows there is plenty of amazing hogwash on the web. I struggle to figure out the truth, keeping that in mind.
2. Never heard or read of Léo Taxil. Thanks for the introduction.
3. I am definitely putting (a) The Mystery of Freemasonry Unveiled by Cardinal Caro y Rodriguez of Chile and (b) Pawns in the Game by William Guy Carr on my books to get and read list.
Thank you for writing this.
I'll say. A remarkable article. I figured out myself that all conspiracy theory books were fakes but I was just operating on intuition and life experience. I never realized that it was already a verifiable known fact to the properly educated. This will likely open a new avenue of reading in my personal education.
It is the Bible that gives the devil a Hebrew name . . .
Satan is a Hebrew god . . . Satanism is a Jewish cult.
Spiritual Israel is Satanism . . . Physical Israel . . . the devil incarnate . . . Antichrist . . .
Ok so why the hex (6) point star of David for Israel's flag. Also Israel was non existent until 1940s so that means it most definitely had to be a people's land that got stolen. Also the all seeing eye pyramid on the American dollar? And also all seeing eye and pyramid on the roof of Israel's Supreme Court? This is a great compilation of people's interpretatipns of the exact same narrative probably. There are still some unanswered questions & way too many other coincidences & narratives. Also why are Americans taught that every country is bad & we must intrude on people's and policies all while dangling a fraudulent piece of paper in their face and massacre innocent humans? It's clear w the theater that is congress and the illusion of a 2 party system someone or some entity has most definitely got an agenda!
All of it is dictated by the Protocols Of Zion! Script is followed to the letter! Which in itself is evidence that protocols are real.
The Protocols is another proven hoax.
You don't seem to realize, though, that the best hoaxes include an element of truth.
It's not "the Freemasons," nor "the Jews," these people don't care about religions or secret societies - they've infiltrated them all.
Come on Mr. E. The protocols is not a proven hoax at all.
I'm not saying it's definitely not a hoax because who the hell knows?
The document was "discovered" by a theosophist, and "debunked" by Allen Dulles who went on to head the CIA.
If you trust Allen Dulles' debunking or indeed anything else Allen Dulles ever did or said then you are - I'm afraid - a sucker. I doubt the man ever spoke a true word in his life.
The debunking claims that the document was copied from a satirical piece by Maurice Joly - but that doesn't really stand up to scrutiny for various reasons.
I'm not arguing that the protocols weren't a hoax. Perhaps they were. They were certainly surrounded by murky inteeligence operatives from start to finish, but the "debunking" was a nonsense and certainly did not prove its case.
No, it was not debunked by Dulles.
It was debunked only years after appearing by a journalist who demonstrated conclusively that huge portions of The Protocols were plagiarized from an earlier book called The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, written by Maurice Joly - and his work indeed does stand up to scrutiny.
https://archive.org/details/truthaboutthepro00londiala
You are incorrect on a number of details here.
1. Graves published his article in the Times in 1921 in three parts between August 16-18. The New York Times featured a series of articles denouncing the Protocols, the first of which appeared on Dec 1st 1920. The Times picked up Graves' story and re-published - merely as part of its series of articles attacking the protocols on Sep 4th 1921.
2. The journalist, Robert Graves, claims to have "discovered" the plagiarism while in Constantinople - the plagiarism was revealed to him by a "white russian" who handed him a copy of Maurice Joly's text and confessed to the hoax/plagiarism. Amusingly - in the context of your articles and our discussion - Joly was a Freemason. This white Russian was never named, nor seen, nor spoken to by anyone else. The story rests entirely on Grave's word. Coincidentally Allen Dulles was in Constantinope too, and returned to the US with the same story at the same time. This story is incredible on its face - a witness without a name who showed up out of the blue in Constaninople suddenly desperate to tell a story discrediting his own side who then immediately disappeared (in fact never even appeared in the first place to anyone except Graves) never to be seen or heard from again?
3. Denouncing the protocols was a political necessity at the time - the Zionists were mounting a strong campaign at the League of Nations to get Britain to turn Palestine into a Jewish homeland following the Balfour declaration. Hence the New York Times series of articles commenced well prior to the Dulles/Graves story. Lord Northcliffe, who was attempting to scupper the campaign and proposed to publish the Protocols in the London Times (he was the owner of the newspaper) was hauled off a train and committed to an insane asylum in Switzerland and then later arrested at the prompting of his own editor when he attempted to enter his own building in order to prevent the publication of this story. The point here is that high politics and skulduggery was involved in ths matter and therefore convenient and magical proofs deserve intense scrutiny - scrutiny which was not provided at the time and has not been permitted an airing since.
4. At the time the stories were published Joly's book was not available as Napoloen III had had all copies confiscated as he had (probably correctly) interpreted the work as a criticism of his rule. That is no longer the case, and you can easily compare both works. Graves gave twelve examples (mere sentences or short phrases) of similarities between the works and claimed there were many more. No-one was able to fact check him, because no copies of Joly's work were available.
However they are available today and it appears at least to me that, while the works are of a similar genre, and contain a handful of similar passages, that's about all that can be said. Reading both texts in toto does not leave one with the impression that either work was derived from the other. At most a few sentences were parapharsed here or there - but even that is not certain.
5. Then there is the matter of dates. The Protocols of Zion contains no reference to Zionism. This suggests that, whether real or hoax, they were written considerably prior to their discovery. The zionist movement was formally constitued by Theodor Herzl in 1897, but the idea and policies had been ongoing for a considerable time before this with the founding of Jewish settlements as early as 1870. Since no mention of zionism is found in the protocols it appears they were written well before that date at least and the protocols document decsribes the plot as centuries old, so - if real - it was not the first version of the plan. So the question then becomes - who plagiarized who? Did Joly perhaps steal from the protocols rather than the other way around? As a Jewish freemason, perhaps he had seen the protocols himself - he was after all a member of the "Lodge of Mizraim" where the Protocols document originated. He was the protege of Adolph Cremieux (Isaac Moise Cremieux 1796-1880) the head of the lodge, founder of the Alliance Israalite Universelle and a Minister in the Jewish-backed government of Leon Gambetta.
6. So we are left wondering whether plagiarism occurred at all, and if it did who plagiarized who? Joly, it turns, out, was an inveterate plagiarizer. He plagiarized the popular novel by Eugene Sue "Les Mystares du Paris." (1845), and the very work in question appears to have extensively plagiarized from another of Cremieux's proteges, Jacob Venedy, entitled, "Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Rousseau." (1850).
7. And finally there is the matter of logic. You claim that
(a) there is a powerful group who are implementing the new world order
(b) this group are extremely powerful and effectively control the world and epsecialy the media
(c) this group is not Jewish or Freemasons, and indeed are seeking to discredit both Jews and Freemasons through vile propaganda
(d) the media, controlled by the vile group who seek to discredit and scapegoat Jews and Freemasons, will not publish this propaganda and indeed have engaged in a century long campaign to discredit it.
Huh? Run that one by me again...
Now I'm not going to claim that the protocols are definitely NOT a hoax. Anything that emerges mysteriously from the swirl of power politics, bearing the fingerprints of masons, theosophists, and Allen Dulles might very well be a hoax.
But the supposed "debunking" is most certainly a hoax. The fact checkers back then were no different to the fact checkers of today - the sordid combination of yellow journalists operating at the direction of deep state handlers.
This is a fanciful dismissal of the actual work done that proves Protocols was a forgery.
You can read the passages from Protocols that were lifted verbatim from Joly's work.
What you're doing is called special pleading and misdirection.
That you continue to cling to this idea is childish. You think your adversary would actually write down their master plan in detail? TWICE?
Les banquiers juifs inondent l’Europe de musulmans et l’Amérique de déchets du tiers-monde . . . L'exil comme une punition pour les gens qui prêchent la sédition devrait être rétabli au cadre juridique de l'Occident. Le judaïsme, le christianisme et l’islam sont des cultes de mort originaires du Moyen-Orient et totalement étrangers à l’Europe et à ses peuples.
Franchement, je m'en fiche si le Pape ou tout autre fou sectaire chrétien dit que nous devons «pâte à tartiner l'autre joue» . . . Police religieuse française comme l'Arabie Saoudite? Sans blague . . . La religieuse police vous arrêter pour avoir critiqué les juifs et les musulmans . . . Le juive occupé gouvernement français a mis Jean-Marie Le Pen en prison pour avoir critiqué l'islam!
La liberté d'expression en France? Taureau-merde!
Si les voilés portant le hijab ont effectivement incendié Notre-Dame, ils nous ont rendu un grand service, plus de trois mille pédérastes ont travaillé dans l'Église catholique française depuis 1950 . . . Le Vatican a une politique de «pâte à tartiner l'autre joue» pour garçons de autel . . . Le contrôle des naissances islamique est une bombe attachée à un enfant de dix ans . . . Le terme «musulmans modérés» signifie simplement qu’ils n’ont plus de munitions . . .
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/pardonne-mon-francais-va-te-faire
I believe the King James bible is accurate. The only good explanation for current events I've found is explained on the Rumble channel E511Ministries. Look for the video with Conspiracy Theory in the title. He explains that he thinks the conspiracy is run by Satan and his minions and no human has ever been let in on the conspiracy.
I notice that people drive themselves half crazy trying to come up with a secular/materialist explanation for things. It can't be done and the logical backflips required make drive them half mental.
Are you the same anti-catholic Mr. E who promotes the "Elite Gender Inversion" conspiracy theory with a library of entertaining videos on Bitchute and Odysee (Formerly youtube)?
Or are you just another anti-catholic with the same low-credibility pseudonym?
[26] The fairies are not to be seized on, and brought to answer for the hurt they do. So also the ecclesiastics vanish away from the tribunals of civil justice.
[27] The ecclesiastics take from young men the use of reason, by certain charms compounded of metaphysics, and miracles, and traditions, and abused Scripture, whereby they are good for nothing else but to execute what they command them. The fairies likewise are said to take young children out of their cradles, and to change them into natural fools, which common people do therefore call elves, and are apt to mischief.
[28] In what shop or operatory the fairies make their enchantment, the old wives have not determined. But the operatories of the clergy are well enough known to be the universities, that received their discipline from authority pontifical.
[29] When the fairies are displeased with anybody, they are said to send their elves to pinch them. The ecclesiastics, when they are displeased with any civil state, make also their elves, that is, superstitious, enchanted subjects, to pinch their princes, by preaching sedition; or one prince, enchanted with promises, to pinch another.
[30] The fairies marry not; but there be amongst them incubi that have copulation with flesh and blood. The priests also marry not.
.
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan: with selected variants from the Latin edition of 1668. Ed. Edwin Curley. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994 . . . Part IV. Of the Kingdom of Darkness . . . Chap. xlvii. Of the Benefit that proceedeth from such Darkness, and to Whom it Accrueth . . . https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/leviathan-part-iv-of-the-kingdom
(Edit: I overlooked the article's last paragraph, where you indicate that something "is afoot." I wrote my response with the impression you believed Taxil's hoax was limited to misunderstanding and misapplication. It seems you believe there is more to it, and I agree. Nevertheless, I stand by my statements, except for the implication you suggest Taxil's influence be dismissed.)
This is interesting. However, is dismissing Taxil's wild hoax the correct response? The uniformity of contemporaneous news outlets reporting on the big reveal (as described in the article) is reminiscent of Operation Mockingbird montages from today. Moreover, even if Taxil's narratives are fabricated, I am not convinced his stories had no purpose beyond pranking the Roman Catholic church.
Jamming a communication channel with bad information is a good way to reduce message comprehension. Additionally, if long-held beliefs concerning Freemasons and Luciferians are demonstrably false, logic does not require we throw the baby out with the bathwater. Instead, careful determination of the obfuscated truth is warranted.
There is depth to cunning; it appeals to one’s intellect, emotions, and desires. Furthermore, deception’s hallmark is approximating truth, as an unconvincing counterfeit is less useful. Various manipulations will compel a group to ignore atrocities (a la Epstein Island and Lahaina) and focus their attention on things convenient for the deceiver. Some may dive headlong into a falsehood. Others will see through it yet accept an authority's probable refutation and analysis. Biblically, the archdemon—called the devil in English—is the father of lies. Perhaps Taxil, whether knowingly or not, served a greater purpose.
True discernment is a gift and praxis. Today, truth is widely considered intersubjective and relative to the ad hoc whims of culture. What constitutes moral behavior, virtue, or valid authority when our reality is no longer objective and no universal truth exists? Democracy will not decide these things.
While perhaps not unequivocally certain, it is evident a certain caste manipulates international mechanisms with varying degrees of coordination. Regimes, NGOs, corporations, and the like ply techniques to sway and scare the plebians, executing an agenda that is, whether in full or in part, shared. Conspiracy theorists' bullhorned tropes of secret societies may paint a fuzzy picture, but the resonation has a source.
The scientific method and technological discovery caused Western civilization (in a general sense) to prosper, grow fat, and ultimately become sick with entitlement and arrogance. Global elites barely hide their intentions to control everyone. They engineer wars, disease, and compulsory treatment. Meanwhile, they salivate over god-like ascension via AI-powered cybernetics.
Many inherit a worldview that life is a simulation within a deterministic universe. Put another way, humans are accidents of nature, act with perceived will, and are motivated by preference. In such a paradigm, claims about meaning or purpose—or any claim at all—are fundamentally empty and have utility only to the extent that belief in each claim facilitates preferred outcomes in subjective experience. Such nonsensical drivel cannot inform the engineering of advanced machines and computing platforms. To account for this, the culture attempts to bifurcate reality into physical and social components.
Taxil was disillusioned with the Roman Catholics, whose leadership was and is a scourge. He bent his mind to parodying that institution and its scripture. Nonetheless, the roiling of religion, secular powers, and world conquest were stoked by his hoax, even if as a drop in the ocean. His input was consumed by the spirit animating technocracy, eugenics, transhumanism, transgenderism, climate alarmism, Bilderberg, EcoHealth, the UN, the WEF… the sum of players is certainly vast. No central headquarters exists in New York. Neither the Club of Rome nor the Palladium Rite is the tail that shakes the dog. The threat manifests itself as a complex system. A salient consideration is whether God is dead or if a metaphysical ultimate reality interacts in man’s bubble of subjective experience.
"Perhaps Taxil, whether knowingly or not, served a greater purpose."
Yes, he did. There is indeed a child-murdering cult out there (see my series "The Apocalypse of Yajnavalkya"), bent on world domination. But it's not the Freemasons, not even remotely close.
Anthony Sutton and Carrol Quigley wrote extensively about them. The actual organization is nameless, and they operate through many, many different proxies.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol No. 7 – World-Wide Wars
❝We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-no-7-world-wide-wars
Those who blame the "Jews" are making a common mistake. The banking cartel is very real but they are Frankists not Jews. They alternate between hiding behind Jews and throwing them under the bus.
The heart and soul of the whole "Jewish World Conspiracy" is the Rothchild family. They are Frankists. They are about as Jewish as the Mafia are Catholic.
The Shabat Levi/Jacob Frank view is that their messiah will return when mankind hits rock bottom. So let's help it on it's way. Every filth and perversion is not only allowed but it is encouraged. Jacob Frank would tie up animals in his garden and do vile things to them IN FRONT OF GUESTS. Dude had issues to put it mildly. The diaries from some of the guests describe these events.
I hardly think that is representative of Judaism.
More importantly than just the Rothchilds themselves is who they used to fill out their crime cartel. Almost all crime cartels start out as ethnic groups. Initially it would have been other Frankists. Later they would expand out to other filth because there are lots of non-Frankist filth in this world willing to exploit and murder other humans for money and power.
The banking cartel is very real and if anyone doubts that please go read "Tragedy & Hope" by Carroll Quigley. It was published in the early 60's and I read it 40 years later. Today we are almost 60 years post publication and it still stands as the best explanation of our world.
So stop calling it "Jewish" and call it what it really is. Frankist & Affiliated Filth Banking Cartel.
Sadly regular Jews think that their elites will protect them. The F&AFBC have thrown them under the bus and hidden behind them repeatedly. Every cry of "anti-semitism" is done by someone duped into thinking they are superior by luck of birth. They are brainwashed and considered "useful idiots" by the F&AFBC.
The whole master race philosophy is based on the belief that by luck of birth into a group you are better than others and your life is worth more. It is not just the Germans, Japanese and Jews that have been duped by it. Lots of others have tried it but it has a 100% failure rate.
I call it the "master race philosophy" and it is very common. By luck of group membership, usually conferred by birth but not always, you are better than others and your life is worth more. There are dozens of examples throughout history and it has a 100% failure rate. The master race always ends up getting decimated. No exceptions.
Jews are the same as other humans. No better, no worse. The proof of that is that they fall for the same master race nonsense and the same excuses offered up by their religious and political leaders.
1) We really are the master race. All those others clearly were not but trust us, we really are.
2) This time it's different or our situation is different.
3) God is on our side or god has chosen us.
4) We are more intelligent/smarter.
All those have been trotted out by various religious and political leaders over the millennia again and again. They all end up getting decimated. Unless the Jewish community starts calling out their religious and political leaders when they utter this nonsense they will be decimated. There are a few that do but they are too few and far between to have a big impact.
The appeal of the master race philosophy is that you don't have to be world class in art, music, academics, sports or anything. Just being part of this group makes you better than others and your life worth more. Very appealing and seductive and very wrong. Fatally wrong.
Sadly it claims a lot of very bright humans. The hubris kicks in and they actually start believing their own lies. Albert Einstein said Germany was a "nation of philosophers" and he was right. Very well educated and bright with a strong philosophical bent. If a nation of philosophers can fall for the master race nonsense then who is kidding who that it "can't happen here"?
It is happening in Israel. Seize living room to the east, forced confinement in a ghetto (Gaza) for millions, economic exploitation and a caste system with the master race on top. To not see the parallels between modern Israel and 1930s Germany requires blinders of epic proportions.
Now it is going world wide. The F&AFBC is setting up "Concentration Camp Earth".
If you need more proof that there is no "Master Race" after the last 3 years then I can't help you. Look at the Jewish response to covid. 90% of the adults over 20 took the first 2 shots, 80% took the third and 50% took the fourth. Not very "masterful" now are they? What race, religion or nationality had the majority say "No" and stand their ground? None. The best of the hold outs were Switzerland and the USA with about 33%. Interestingly they are the 2 heaviest armed civilian populations.
As I final thought I leave you with this:
https://i.postimg.cc/8zdNzFyQ/Israel-Netanyahu-Bennett-Bourla.png
Sry, I'm not buying this DOUBLE hoax from Taxil. Why? Jesuits are known converts. Their soul mission was to DESTROY/subvert the Catholic church from within. And they had a LOT of success. Why? Well, because the jews have been exiled by Christians from many places - due to their horrible satanic practices! So they converted to Christianity to protect themselves. First they were forced by Popes and later they did it on purpose and en mass! Read “The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews” by Robert Aleksander Maryks.
Freemasonry, which in the beggining was about masons who built all the magnificent buildings from Tartaria period, was completely hijacked by jews in 18th century in London. And became speculative Freemasonry. From that moment it is used to subvert all the monarchies and governments/politicians in the world which were not into usury and satanism. Weimar period of Germany is what ALL these parasites are about! And now USA is the new Weimar. It is SO obvious.
Heard of New Chronology and Fomenko's work? Jesuits, with J.Scalinger at the helm, also added 1000 years to the official chronology!
If you can find a single shred of evidence demonstrating the existence of the Palladium Rite that doesn't trace back to Taxil's hoax, post it.
Otherwise you're barking up the wrong tree.
Barking eh? Protocols are fake eh?
Gd luck with your spiel...
Why is the Palladium rite essential to the thesis that Freemasonry is instrumental in the new world order conspiracy?
The Palladium rite can indeed be a hoax, as can Pike's imaginary letter, and yet Freemasonry can still be complict as all getout.
The link between Lucifer and Freemasonry does not depend solely on Leo Taxil's work. There is a mountain of other evidence based on the statements and correspondence of dozens of individuals.
Albert Pike himself wrote (in Morals and Dogma - a paean to pagan and kabbalistic thought and ritual) "The Apocalypse is, to those who receive the nineteenth Degree, the Apotheosis of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer. LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not! for traditions are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed. Plato and Philo, also, were inspired."
That seems pretty clear to me. Paraphrasing: once you are so amazing that you make it to the nineteenth degree you can set aside your simple faith in God and take your inspiration from Lucifer whose light is so bright that it is dangerous for lesser folks but OK for us morally superior beings.
I use that example because you seem to make the leap from the premise that Taxil invented Pike's letter to the conclusion that therefore Freemasonry is not Luciferian - but that is bad logic.
I think it is entirely possible, perhaps even likely, that Leo was himself a mason and that his entire exercise in performative art was a propaganda device which was intended to throw people off the scent.
Your interpretation of Pike's work is incorrect.
I address every single reference Pike makes to "Lucifer" in this book, including this very quote, in a later post. You should read those as well.
The quote you reference makes clear that after the 19th degree the "Apocalypse", or realization, of the "Sublime Faith, which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer." is pretty obviously NOT someone saying they worship Lucifer.
In fact, it is the complete opposite.
This is consistent with what Pike says about Lucifer in other parts of Morals & Dogma.
I provided the whole quote.
Here it is again:
"The Apocalypse is, to those who receive the nineteenth Degree, the Apotheosis of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer. LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not! for traditions are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed. Plato and Philo, also, were inspired."
I agree it could be interpreted in the way you suggest. But it's scarcely clear. For the second part of the quote gives a very mixed message: "traditions are full of Divine Revelations and Inspirations: and Inspiration is not of one Age nor of one Creed. Plato and Philo, also, were inspired." That is most definitely not Christian, since wherever Plato and Philo drew there inspiration from, it was not Christ or the Christian God. So where did they draw there inspiration from? And why is that juxtaposed in the same paragraph with the Lucifer reference?
And the rest of the book provides a great deal more context. It's a paean to the Kabbalah (and other more ancient philosophies and mystical traditions, but the Kabbalah above all) - the Jewish mystical tradition which did not come from God at all, but was added to the Jewish faith by rabbis without instruction from God - and entirely perverts the meaning of God's word.
The idea that Pike is a Christian is absurd on its face. He led a secret society which is unChristian in and of itself and his book is inspired by just about everything ancient philosophy, spiritual tradition and false God from ancient Egypt onwards. The bible is crystal clear about this.
And if he is not a Christian, then what is his purpose? To subvert the word of God - to tempt people away from God's word with his teaching? Who does that remind you of?
Pike is saying that Plato and Philo were inspired by the same Sublime Faith, "which aspires to God alone."
This is obvious if you read Morals & Dogma, and not quotes from websites with an agenda to sell you.
You will find a complete deconstruction of the Taxil/Luciferian hoax here:
Part 1: https://mrereports.substack.com/p/decoding-the-taxil-hoax-part-1
Part 2: https://mrereports.substack.com/p/decoding-the-taxil-hoax-part-2
You will also find the true identity of the "cabal", for lack of a better word.
I've read your deconstruction of Taxil. But the Luciferian nature of freemasonry does not depend on Taxil alone, or even mostly. That is a canard - and one I suspect that was deliberately set up by Taxil.
The evidence for the antiChristian/Luciferian/pagan nature of freemasonry (and its antecedent organizations) is vast and overwhelming. Taxil is merely a detail - an obvious attempt to throw casual investigators off the scent.
Repetitions and remixes of Taxil's hoax does not make for "vast and overwhelming" evidence.
You have simply decided who your enemy is and are pursuing it in spite of everything contrary to your prejudices.
There is plenty of evidence which predates Taxil, and plenty which is entirely independent of him.
For example the links from Frankism to the Illuminati, the Illuminati takeover over of freemasonry as acknowledged by masons at the time (and well after the supposed end of the Illuminati when the elector of Bavaria banned them). And of course's Marx's association with the Illuminati (the communist manifesto is just plagiarism of Weishaupt's work) and his open admissions within his poetry that he marches to Satan's drum is literally damning.
Or the countless links through the Theosophical society to masonry, and various magical/Satanic societies (e.g. Golden Dawn, OTO, A.A. etc.) and political movements. And Helena Blavatsky's references to Lucifer are less ambiguous than Pike's.
The Gnostic (Lucifer/Satanism) influence over the Templars is widely accepted and there is considerable evidence for the Freemasons being simply a more recent incarnation of the Templars via the Rosicrucians.
The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita is a Freemasonic plot to infiltrate and overthrow the Catholic church.
There are a hundred more pieces of evidence, including direct quotes from Masons, intelligence agents and contemporary commenters.
Taxil was what we today, in a 5th gen warfare manual, would term a chaos agent. His job was to mislead, confuse and muddy the waters. Job well done apparently.
Hello, im a french catholic and I Wonder if you know the existence of the Vaughan memories and her book "the 33rd CRISPI".
If you wants to connect the dots, I highly recommend you to read the book of Mr Pierrecourt Paul Étienne "From Diana Vaughan to the secret of La Salette" 2019
Our Lady at Fatima and La Salette warned us of what s to come and it s happening right before our eyes.
PS ; catholics aren t cannibals because the sacrifice of the mass is non bloody, we eat god (spirit soul and corpse). Satan worshipers who stole the holy sacrement for their dark mass knows it...
Youtube link to mr Pierrecourt video on histoire book ;
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wV4gfSMZ9tc&pp=ygUNZGlhbmEgdmF1Z2hhbg%3D%3D
Janet Ossebaard, of the video series "Fall of the Cabal" and "Sequel to the Fall of the Cabal" said she found a 14th century manuscript very similar to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I believe there really is a group with those horrible goals and pretending to be Jews. The Book of Revelations may have been 3rd century, not first, but whatever you believe about who wrote it or its religious veracity, that is a document at least 17 centuries old. It says at least twice "there are those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan." And who are the ELDERS of Zion? Not likely Jews. These are Khazarians or Canaanites. The Bible repeatedly mentions child sacrifice in Canaan/ancient Israel, and remains of it have been found in many places.
Everyone knows there is plenty of amazing hogwash on the web. I struggle to figure out the truth, keeping that in mind.
Tomorrow morning I'm going to rip the mask off this secret cult that's been masquerading as so many other groups for millennia!
1. Great writing.
2. Never heard or read of Léo Taxil. Thanks for the introduction.
3. I am definitely putting (a) The Mystery of Freemasonry Unveiled by Cardinal Caro y Rodriguez of Chile and (b) Pawns in the Game by William Guy Carr on my books to get and read list.
BTW, you can find me here
The Ideological Rot of America https://torrancestephensphd.substack.com/p/the-ideological-rot-of-america